Sample report

Market access audit: Kenya

Sample · example brief · data as of 2026-10-09

This is a worked example of what a $500 audit looks like. The client and brief are invented for illustration. Every figure comes from the sources named under it. Your audit is written for your market and your criteria.

Example brief. A UK-based investor with about $250,000 to deploy over the next 12 months and a five year horizon. Two ideas: a rental apartment in Nairobi, and a minority stake in an agri-processing business. Question asked: Can I do this in Kenya as a non-resident, what does it take, and what could go wrong?

1. The short answer

  • Kenya sits in the lower half of the ranking, with a strong macro base but weak openness and stability. It scores 47 out of 100 (elevated), ranked 149 of 199 countries. Macro stability is its best pillar (78); political stability and security is its weakest (30).
  • The rules shape the structure more than the score does. Non-citizens can hold land only on leasehold of up to 99 years, and cannot own agricultural land; apartments are sold on leasehold sectional titles. For the investor, that means apartments on leasehold titles, and the agri-processing idea structured as a stake in a Kenyan company that leases, not owns, land.
  • Verdict for this brief: workable, with conditions. Fit is good on sector (agriculture is central to the economy) and acceptable on macro; it depends on structure, currency tolerance and local counsel before any money moves.

2. Investability read

The Invest Global score combines six weighted pillars from World Bank, OECD and IMF data. The full method is public.

PillarKenyaWeight
Institutions and rule of law4425%
Openness to foreign investment3520%
Macro and financial stability7818%
Political stability and security3010%
Growth and upside5112%
Market depth and infrastructure3415%
Overall score47100%

Against regional peers on the same method:

CountryScoreGDP growthInflationFDI restrictiveness
Morocco634.6%0.7%0.03
Rwanda629.4%5.9%0.03
Ghana546.0%14.2%Not covered
Uganda526.3%3.6%0.10
Tanzania495.9%3.3%0.25
Kenya474.6%4.1%0.22
Nigeria404.0%23.0%Not covered

FDI restrictiveness is the OECD index from 0 (open) to 1 (closed). Sources: World Bank WDI and WGI, IMF WEO, OECD. Latest year available in each series.

3. The numbers behind it

IndicatorLatestSource and year
GDP$136 billionWorld Bank 2025
Real GDP growth4.6%World Bank 2025
Inflation4.1%World Bank 2025
Government debt69% of GDPIMF 2025
Reserves4.6 months of importsWorld Bank 2025
Current account-2.1% of GDPWorld Bank 2025
FDI inflows0.8% of GDPWorld Bank 2025
Exchange rate129 shillings per US dollarWorld Bank 2025
Private credit29% of GDPWorld Bank 2025
Electricity access77%World Bank 2024

4. Entry rules for a non-resident

Foreign investment screen. The OECD restrictiveness index for Kenya is 0.22. Its parts: foreign equity limits 0.16, screening and approval 0.00, key personnel 0.00, other operating restrictions 0.07. In plain terms: there is no general screening hurdle, and what restriction exists is mostly caps on foreign shareholding in certain sectors. That is far more restrictive than Morocco or Rwanda (both 0.03), so the sector matters.

Land. Non-citizens can hold land only on leasehold of up to 99 years, and cannot own agricultural land; apartments are sold on leasehold sectional titles. Treat title checks and the lands registry search as a gating item for any property purchase.

Implication. Apartments are the cleaner route for the property idea. For the agri-processing idea, test whether the target sector carries a foreign equity cap before agreeing terms, and structure land access as a lease held by the company.

5. Fit against the brief

  • Sector fit. Kenya's economic exposure is highest in agriculture (81 of 100), telecom (80) and renewables (69). Agriculture is 23% of GDP. Exposure shows how central a sector is to the economy, not how attractive a deal is. It does confirm there is depth around the agri idea.
  • Rental income benchmark. Our benchmark for a Nairobi entry-tier apartment is about $59,000 at around $1,073 per square metre, with a gross yield estimate near 7%. These are scaled benchmarks, not live listings, so real quotes must be checked against actual comparables.
  • Budget. $250,000 comfortably covers an entry or growth tier apartment. It is thin for a controlling stake in an operating processor, which is why a minority stake was the right framing.
  • Currency. Income and exit value are in shillings (129 per dollar). Inflation of 4.1% is moderate, but a sterling or dollar investor carries the exchange-rate risk over five years.

6. Risks to price in

RiskWhat the data says
Political stabilityStability pillar scores 30 of 100; the World Bank governance measure is -1.12 (scale roughly -2.5 to +2.5).
Rule of lawInstitutions pillar 44 of 100; rule of law measure -0.47. Contract enforcement and title disputes are the practical exposure.
Public debt69% of GDP: not extreme, but a pressure point for tax and currency policy.
Financial depthPrivate credit 29% of GDP. Local financing is limited, so assume equity-funded deals.
ExitThin secondary markets for private stakes. Plan the exit before you enter.

7. Questions for local counsel

  1. Does the target sector carry a foreign equity cap, and does the planned stake fit under it?
  2. How should land access be structured for the agri business: lease terms, registration and renewal?
  3. What are the title checks and registry searches for the apartment, and who carries the risk if a title is disputed?
  4. What taxes apply to rental income, capital gains and repatriation of profit for a non-resident?
  5. What shareholder protections and exit rights should be written into a minority stake?
  6. Which approvals or registrations are required for a foreign shareholder?

8. Next steps and alternatives

  • Commission a legal check on the two structures above before any deposit.
  • Shortlist three Nairobi apartments and three agri-processing targets, and test them against the risk table.
  • If openness is the priority, compare Rwanda (score 62, FDI restrictiveness 0.03) or Morocco (63). If the agri thesis is the point, Kenya remains the stronger fit on sector depth.

Sources and limits

World Bank World Development Indicators and Worldwide Governance Indicators, IMF World Economic Outlook, OECD FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index, Invest Global curated ownership and benchmark data (property benchmarks dated 2026-09-25). Data as of 2026-10-09. This sample is educational research, not investment, legal or tax advice, and not an offer or solicitation of any security or product. Rules change; local counsel must confirm what applies to you.

Want this for your market and your criteria?

One market, written report within five business days, and a 30 minute call. $500 flat.

See the audit and book